Homer Simpson Tops Controversial ‘Greatest Characters’ List

Harry Potter may be king of the pop-culture book-sales world, but when it comes to the entire universe of modern-day showbiz characters, nothing beats a Simpson. Homer, to be exact (sorry, Bart).

For the most part Entertainment Weekly did a pretty fine job of putting together their list of The 100 Greatest Characters of the Last 20 years. But that doesn’t mean there’s not some room for dissent.

The pick of Homer Simpson as the best character over the last 20 years is fitting: he’s actually been around for 20 years. Sure, diehard fans will tell you “The Simpsons” isn’t what it once was, but for a single character — particularly an animated one — to sustain such a presence in popular culture over such a long time is truly remarkable.

There’s not a lot to debate in the top 10. It’s hard to argue with iconic names such as Harry Potter, Tony Soprano and Carrie Bradshaw (Okay, maybe Edward Scissorhands, who comes in at number 7, is ranked a little too high.)

Working down the list, the choices become more questionable. Yes, “Glee” is the popular TV-show of-the-moment. No question about that. And no one is at all doubting the comedic genius of Jane Lynch. But, it may be a bit premature to rank the Machiavellian cheerleading coach, Sue Sylvester, all the way up at 18. “Glee” is just finishing its first season and, as of this writing, has aired the relatively low number of just 20 episodes. If this list were created in 2003, would Seth Cohen from “The O.C.” (the “Glee” of its day) be on the list? This is not to say Sylvester shouldn’t be on the list at all, but ranked higher than Roseanne Conner, Stephen Colbert, Jack Bauer, John Locke, Don Draper and Ally McBeal? Sue herself might even snarl at the implausibility of it.

Then there are the characters that have no business being on the list at all. It’s hard to believe Will Smith’s Hancock is the 91st best character of the last 20 years, period. But is it even the 91st best character Will Smith has portrayed in last 20 years? And, really, Hancock ranks higher than Lisbeth Salander of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”?

Also, even though “Battlestar Galactica” fans were not entirely happy with the ending, it would seem that that its female protagonist, Starbuck, deserves a higher ranking than 72. Seriously, she’s behind Molly Shannon’s Mary Katherine Gallagher? Come to think of it, of all the “SNL” characters, why is she the only one ranked instead of Wayne Campbell (who is mentioned on the page)? Just as a comparison of their importance to popular culture, Mary Katherine Gallagher’s movie, “Superstar,” grossed $30 million compared to “Wayne’s World”‘s $121 Million.

Not to say the list is all bad. Far from it. In fact, it’s quite refreshing to see some of the choices EW made. Gob Bluth from the canceled, cult-classic “Arrested Development” is a welcome sight. And thankfully, they chose Neil Patrick Harris’ Barney Stinson from “How I Met Your Mother” over his arguably better-known role as Doogie Houser. Including one of the most unusual sketch comedy creations ever, Dave Chappelle’s Clayton Bigsby, is laudable. As was picking Ricky Gervais’ original, UK “Office” manager, David Brent, over the more familiar and almost (almost!) equally deserving, Michael Scott, portrayed by Steve Carrell. But, really, not one character from the American version of “The Office”? Wither Dwight Schrute?

That’s one major flaw with lists such as these: once a character is chosen from a particular show, the rest of the cast seems to be off limits (unless chosen as a pair). Cosmo Kramer from “Seinfeld” gets the nod, so, no soup for you, Elaine Benes and George Costanza (or, for that matter, Larry David from “Curb Your Enthusiasm”). Jennifer Aniston’s “Friends” Rachel Greene is listed, so Chandler Bing is left out.

Then again, this is an arbitrary list, which means any arguments are quite arbitrary as well — and fun. So, thanks, EW, for starting the debate.

Posted in Entertainment, The Simpsons.


  1. Pingback: uscojufm9r4tue4urtse4

  2. Pingback: https://www.manytube.net/

  3. Pingback: https://royalcbd.com/product/cbd-capsules-25mg/

  4. Pingback: conectar joycon a pc

  5. Hear why Millions are using this White Noise track for SLEEPING through the night. Click on repeat (loop) and sleep all night long. Optimized sound for smart phones and tablets: https://open.spotify.com/track/3UaN05tW5st7nYdxasbXcE

  6. Pingback: about canada pharmacy

  7. Pingback: 메리트 카지노

  8. Pingback: xe88 live casino

  9. Pingback: natural products

  10. Pingback: paydayloano.com

  11. Pingback: what's the best weight loss pill out there

  12. Pingback: Loozap Cote D'ivoire

  13. Pingback: big fish casino

  14. Pingback: scam site

  15. Pingback: podcast transcript

  16. Pingback: sàn giao dịch forex

  17. Pingback: airport transfers

  18. Pingback: Bsd city

  19. Pingback: vitamin

  20. Pingback: https://www.bbdcinema.com

  21. Pingback: best romantic movies 2019

  22. Pingback: kitchen appliances

  23. Pingback: detectives privados toledo

  24. Pingback: canada mushrooms

  25. Pingback: pharmacy canada pharmacy

  26. Pingback: film izle

  27. Pingback: film izle

  28. Pingback: hd film izle

  29. Pingback: visit here

  30. Pingback: online casino

  31. Pingback: Drucker mieten für das Büro

  32. Pingback: Aaron Lal

  33. Pingback: malaysia mega888 jackpot

  34. Pingback: 13x4 lace front wigs

  35. Pingback: silk hair

  36. Pingback: ラブドール セックス

  37. e. Lead something that would benefit readers. Most likely you are able to help many others reap the benefits of your activities. Certainly it is easy to inspire visitors in certain way. Do not be scared to expose a little something about your self that lets visitors know alot more about who you are. It is not nearly running a blog for organization. Blogging is intended to become like pleasurable conversation.


  38. Pingback: download mega888 demo

  39. Pingback: payroll services singapore

  40. Pingback: Buy Weed Online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.